C O M M O N   L A W   R E V I E W

 

 


 

THIS web site presents a new kind of conservatism, actually only a new-seeming kind; it is rather the legacy of the Christian West: Common Law Studies is dedicated to the proposition that true conservatism lies "Beyond Whig and Marxist." This brand of conservatism is dedicated to preserving and carrying forward the legacy of Western civilization as it really stands, rather than in either the denatured form of classical liberalism or the perverse organicism of socialism, social democracy, fascism, communism.... The true nature of Western civilization, which both liberalism and socialism have striven mightily to abolish, is Christian and classical, and it is legal: the legacy of citizenship and liberty under law.

Western civilization for centuries grew under the aegis of church and empire, incorporating the trusts of Israel, Greece, and Rome, forming a new social order among the Germanic tribes which had been assimilated into the Roman West, generating a new way of life incorporating both liberty and authority, community and society, the importance of the group and the freedom of the individual, the symbiosis of commutative and distributive justice.

That legacy culminated in the tradition of the Ius Commune, the Common Law, which ruled the minds of those across the West involved in the university, the courtroom, city hall, princely or kingly courts, and anywhere else matters of law and order and justice were treated. This Common Law was decentralized, unlegislated, evolved under the influence of both Roman and Canon Law along with the other legal orders of the West: feudal law, manorial law, the law Merchant, and the like. All were brought together in terms of the theological and philosophical, Christian and classical, ways of thinking that had been developed by Augustine, Boetius, Isidore of Seville, Anselm and Aquinas, fleshed out by the Roman lawyers like Irnerius, Azo, Accursius, and the Canon lawyers like Gratian. The tradition was consolidated by the great Bartolus of Saxoferrato and his followers. It reached further heights and new application in the work of the School of Salamanca and Fernando Vazquez de Menchaca, and reached something of an apogee in the work of the German Calvinist Johannes Althusius.

All of this work was characterized by fidelity to the church, submission to lawful authority, and a commitment to expanding the rights of the citizenry, not by revolution but by amelioration, a progress in virtue which was the only source of durable freedom.

The remembrance of this is now of course lost in the hazy past of culpable forgetfulness. What we now understand as the roots of Western freedom is a story of free thinking triumphing over bigoted superstition, of individual liberty triumphing over the tyranny of king and priest, of autonomous values triumphing over repressive restraint.

This is the Whig Interpretation of History, and it is the fundamental legitimating myth of the modern age. Its basic juridical postulate is natural rights, which provide the political blank check to do away with everything derived from the Christian inheritance of liberty under law. The result, apparently paradoxical but actually rigorously logical, is the imposition of a tyranny of the political process in which the winner takes all and the will of the evanescent majority smashes everything about it of enduring value.

This is not just a problem for domestic politics. It is a universal problem. For history is seamless, and the progress of the liberal tyranny is of global dimension. Liberalism has become Globalism, and the fight is now to establish the principles of the Common Law in the face of the Globalist Alternative.

The Common Law makes possible a truly transnational world-order without the threat of a global super-state. The Common Law establishes the primacy of private law, and the strict subordination of the state and national sovereignty to the universal law establishing a private-sector continuum across the globe. States and nations erect and establish boundaries within this continuum, but those boundaries remain permeable, they do not eradicate this continuum.

The Common Law, then, is not just a law order regulating internal civil affairs; it is a law order inscribed in the fabric of the creation, a law order which sovereigns are to uphold but cannot supersede. The Common Law cuts across all internal legal orders established by sovereign states. It conditions them and determines them. It may be ignored or consciously opposed, but it is never eliminated.

It is therefore short-sighted, and, in the current globalist-interventionist climate, downright dangerous to neglect the transnational dimension of public affairs and focus only on the domestic level. For there is taking place massive behind-the-scenes coordination and cooperation, to direct the affairs of nations in a specific direction, a civil-law [note 1]   as opposed to a common-law direction, and this trend needs to be combated. This web site is one effort to accomplish just that.

For a book-length introduction to the Common Law tradition, follow this link.

 

 

 Feedback?

 

 

 


  [note 1] What is the Civil-Law Tradition?

This is the tradition in Western legal history that champions state sovereignty as the source of all law. The civil-law tradition is based on the conflict-of-interests world-view, which views ultimate reality as a struggle for survival in the face of a merciless, impersonal environment. In order to survive in the face of this antagonistic environment, mankind must organize and submit to centralized direction. See A Common Law, pp. 106ff.